Inferring the Dynamics of Diversification: A Coalescent Approach
Open Access
- 28 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Biology
- Vol. 8 (9) , e1000493
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000493
Abstract
Recent analyses of the fossil record and molecular phylogenies suggest that there are fundamental limits to biodiversity, possibly arising from constraints in the availability of space, resources, or ecological niches. Under this hypothesis, speciation rates decay over time and biodiversity eventually saturates, with new species emerging only when others are driven to extinction. This view of macro-evolution contradicts an alternative hypothesis that biodiversity is unbounded, with species ever accumulating as they find new niches to occupy. These contrasting theories of biodiversity dynamics yield fundamentally different explanations for the disparity in species richness across taxa and regions. Here, we test whether speciation rates have decayed or remained constant over time, and whether biodiversity is saturated or still expanding. We first derive a general likelihood expression for internode distances in a phylogeny, based on the well-known coalescent process from population genetics. This expression accounts for either time-constant or time-variable rates, time-constant or time-variable diversity, and completely or incompletely sampled phylogenies. We then compare the performance of different diversification scenarios in explaining a set of 289 phylogenies representing amphibians, arthropods, birds, mammals, mollusks, and flowering plants. Our results indicate that speciation rates typically decay over time, but that diversity is still expanding at present. The evidence for expanding-diversity models suggests that an upper limit to biodiversity has not yet been reached, or that no such limit exists. Is species diversity in equilibrium, or is it still expanding? Are there ecological limits on diversity, or will evolution always find new niches for further specialization? These are all long-standing questions about the dynamics of macro-evolution, which have been examined using the fossil record and, more recently, molecular phylogenies. Understanding these long-term dynamics is central to our knowledge of how species diversify and ultimately what controls present-day biodiversity across groups and regions. We have developed a novel approach to infer diversification dynamics from the phylogenies of present-day species. Applying our approach to a diverse set of empirical phylogenies, we demonstrate that speciation rates have decayed over time, suggesting ecological constraints to diversification. Nonetheless, we find that diversity is still expanding at present, suggesting either that these ecological constraints do not impose an upper limit to diversity or that this upper limit has not yet been reached.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- On incomplete sampling under birth–death models and connections to the sampling-based coalescentJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2009
- Estimating Trait-Dependent Speciation and Extinction Rates from Incompletely Resolved PhylogeniesSystematic Biology, 2009
- Heritability of Extinction Rates Links Diversification Patterns in Molecular Phylogenies and FossilsSystematic Biology, 2009
- Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebratesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Explosive Pleistocene diversification and hemispheric expansion of a “great speciator”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil recordProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Density-dependent diversification in North American wood warblersProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2008
- The genomic and epidemiological dynamics of human influenza A virusNature, 2008
- Density-Dependent Cladogenesis in BirdsPLoS Biology, 2008
- Inferring Evolutionary Process from Phylogenetic Tree ShapeThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1997