Effect of Dialysis Dose and Membrane Flux in Maintenance Hemodialysis
Top Cited Papers
- 19 December 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 347 (25) , 2010-2019
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa021583
Abstract
The effects of the dose of dialysis and the level of flux of the dialyzer membrane on mortality and morbidity among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis are uncertain. We undertook a randomized clinical trial in 1846 patients undergoing thrice-weekly dialysis, using a two-by-two factorial design to assign patients randomly to a standard or high dose of dialysis and to a low-flux or high-flux dialyzer. In the standard-dose group, the mean (±SD) urea-reduction ratio was 66.3±2.5 percent, the single-pool Kt/V was 1.32±0.09, and the equilibrated Kt/V was 1.16±0.08; in the high-dose group, the values were 75.2±2.5 percent, 1.71±0.11, and 1.53±0.09, respectively. Flux, estimated on the basis of beta2-microglobulin clearance, was 3±7 ml per minute in the low-flux group and 34±11 ml per minute in the high-flux group. The primary outcome, death from any cause, was not significantly influenced by the dose or flux assignment: the relative risk of death in the high-dose group as compared with the standard-dose group was 0.96 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.10; P=0.53), and the relative risk of death in the high-flux group as compared with the low-flux group was 0.92 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.05; P=0.23). The main secondary outcomes (first hospitalization for cardiac causes or death from any cause, first hospitalization for infection or death from any cause, first 15 percent decrease in the serum albumin level or death from any cause, and all hospitalizations not related to vascular access) also did not differ significantly between either the dose groups or the flux groups. Possible benefits of the dose or flux interventions were suggested in two of seven prespecified subgroups of patients. Patients undergoing hemodialysis thrice weekly appear to have no major benefit from a higher dialysis dose than that recommended by current U.S. guidelines or from the use of a high-flux membrane.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sorbent hemoperfusion in end-stage renal disease: An in-depth reviewAdvances in Renal Replacement Therapy, 2002
- Comorbidity assessment using the Index of Coexistent Diseases in a multicenter clinical trialKidney International, 2001
- The case for dialy dialysis: Its impact on costs and quality of lifeAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2001
- Mortality Risk by Hemodialyzer Reuse Practice and Dialyzer Membrane Characteristics: Results From the USRDS Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality StudyAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2001
- ForewordAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2001
- Comparison of mortality in ESRD patients on convective and diffusive extracorporeal treatmentsKidney International, 1999
- Single Compartment Models for Evaluating β2-Microglobulin Clearance During HemodialysisAsaio Journal, 1997
- The Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study: Rationale for Selection of InterventionsSeminars in Dialysis, 1996
- Effect of the Hemodialysis Prescription on Patient MorbidityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958