Hemodynamic Mechanisms Responsible for Reduced Subendocardial Coronary Reserve in Dogs With Severe Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
- 15 August 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 92 (4) , 978-986
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.4.978
Abstract
Background Reduced subendocardial coronary reserve is a hallmark of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The goal of this study was to determine whether hemodynamic, as opposed to structural, mechanisms were responsible for the reduced subendocardial coronary reserve. Methods and Results The effects of near-maximal vasodilation with adenosine were examined in 10 conscious dogs with LVH (79% increase in ratio of LV weight to body weight) induced by aortic banding in puppies with and without preload reduction. At baseline, LV end-diastolic pressure, LV end-diastolic circumferential and compressive radial wall stresses, and LV myocardial blood flow were similar in dogs with LVH and sham-operated controls, while LV end-systolic circumferential wall stress tended to be greater in the LVH group compared with the control group. In control dogs, adenosine reduced LV circumferential end-systolic and end-diastolic wall stresses and compressive radial subendocardial wall stress; LV subendocardial blood flow increased (from 1.41±0.16 to 3.58±0.27 mL · min−1 · g−1) and the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial blood flow decreased from 1.30±0.07 to 0.69±0.05. In dogs with LVH, during adenosine infusion, LV circumferential end-systolic and end-diastolic wall stresses and LV radial subendocardial wall stresses remained elevated, the increase in LV subendocardial blood flow was significantly smaller (from 1.11±0.11 to 2.27±0.24 mL · min−1 · g−1, P<.05), and the subendocardial/epicardial ratio fell to a lower level (from 1.22±0.17 to 0.35±0.03, P<.05). When LV wall stresses during adenosine were reduced in a subgroup of 5 dogs with LVH, the endocardium/epicardium ratio during adenosine infusion was no longer different from that in control dogs (0.63±0.11), nor was the level of subendocardial blood flow different (3.42±0.60 mL · min−1 · g−1). Conclusions These data suggest that hemodynamic factors, eg, compressive forces, are an important component of the reduced subendocardial coronary reserve as opposed to structural alterations, even in the presence of severe LVH.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coronary vascular mechanisms involved in decompensation from hypertrophy to heart failureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Prognostic Implications of Echocardiographically Determined Left Ventricular Mass in the Framingham Heart StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Effects of hypertrophy on the coronary circulationProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1988
- Effects of Enalapril on Mortality in Severe Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Transmural myocardial perfusionProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1987
- Distribution of myocardial stress and its influence on coronary blood flowJournal of Biomechanics, 1985
- The role of subendocardial ischemia in perpetuating myocardial failure in patients with nonischemic congestive cardiomyopathyAmerican Heart Journal, 1983
- Abnormal coronary vascular response to exercise in dogs with severe right ventricular hypertrophy.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1981
- Regional capillary supply in the normal and hypertrophied rat heartMicrovascular Research, 1980
- Myocardial Blood Flow Distribution in Concentric Left Ventricular HypertrophyJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1978