Is the Market Being Fooled? An Error-Based Screen for Manipulation
Preprint
- 1 August 2007
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In this paper, we develop a new screen to detect manipulation in commodities markets. If manipulation is occurring, not all of the relevant information is being filtered through the market, which means that the market is being "fooled" and its ability to forecast future prices is impaired. If futures prices are the market's estimates of future spot prices, manipulation can be expected, therefore, to result in larger first and second moments of the forecast error in those prices, controlling for other factors (not related to manipulation) that could affect risk premium. We apply our technique to the Hunt Brothers' silver manipulation episode of 1979-80. After controlling for market and macroeconomic fundamentals not affected by manipulation (but which could explain variations in risk premium), we find that the variance of the bias is significantly larger under manipulation, and the mean reverses sign consistent with backwardation.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Financial Markets and the Real EconomyPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2005
- What Does the Yield Curve Tell us about GDP Growth?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2004
- The Term Structure as a Predictor of Real Economic ActivityThe Journal of Finance, 1991
- Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1989
- FUTURES MARKET BACKWARDATION UNDER RISK NEUTRALITYEconomic Inquiry, 1986
- Monopoly, Manipulation, and the Regulation of Futures MarketsThe Journal of Business, 1986
- Inventories as an Asset: The Volatility of Copper PricesInternational Economic Review, 1985
- Returns to Speculators and the Theory of Normal BackwardationThe Journal of Finance, 1985
- Constitutional Law. Schools and School Districts. Prohibition of Long Hair Absent Showing of Actual Disruption Violates High School Student's Constitutional Rights. Breen v. Kahl, 419 F. 2d 1034 (7th Cir. 1969), Cert. Denied, 398 U. S. 937 (1970). Requirement That High School Students Shave Is Valid If Founded on a Rational Basis. Stevenson v. Board of Education, 426 F. 2d 1154 (5th Cir.), Cert. Denied, 400 U. S. 957 (1970)Harvard Law Review, 1971
- South Africa: Hearings before the Subcommittee on African Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate. 94th Cong., 2nd sess.Published by Brill ,1970