Is it possible to exclude a diagnosis of myocardial damage within six hours of admission to an emergency department? Diagnostic cohort
- 18 August 2001
- Vol. 323 (7309) , 372
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7309.372
Abstract
Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy and accuracy of an emergency department based six hour rule-out protocol for myocardial damage. Design: Diagnostic cohort study. Setting: Emergency department of an inner city university hospital. Participants: 383 consecutive patients aged over 25 years with chest pain of less than 12 hours' duration who were at low to moderate risk of acute myocardial infarction. Intervention: Serial measurements of creatine kinase MB mass and continuous ST segment monitoring for six hours with 12 leads. Main outcome measure: Performance of the diagnostic test against a gold standard consisting of either a 48 hour measurement of troponin T concentration or screening for myocardial infarction according to the World Health Organization's criteria. Results: Outcome of the gold standard test was available for 292 patients. On the diagnostic test for the protocol, 53 patients had positive results and 239 patients had negative results. There were 18 false positive results and one false negative result. Sensitivity was 97.2% (95% confidence interval 95.0% to 99.0%), specificity 93.0% (90.0% to 96.0%), the negative predictive value 99.6%, and the positive predictive value 66.0%. The positive likelihood ratio was 13.9 and the negative likelihood ratio 0.03. Conclusions: The six hour rule-out protocol for myocardial infarction is accurate and efficacious. It can be used in patients presenting to emergency departments with chest pain indicating a low to moderate risk of myocardial infarction. What is already known on this topic Many patients with chest pain in emergency departments indicating a low to moderate risk of myocardial infarction are admitted to rule out myocardial damage Some 6% of those discharged have undiagnosed myocardial damage What this study adds An emergency department based chest pain assessment unit protocol to rule out myocardial damage is sensitive enough to allow safe discharge of patients at low to moderate risk of myocardial infarction within six hours Such units can also reduce the number of patients admitted unnecessarilyKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective audit of incidence of prognostically important myocardial damage in patients discharged from emergency department Commentary: Time for improved diagnosis and management of patients presenting with acute chest painBMJ, 2000
- Cardiac troponin T in diagnosis of acute myocardial infarctionClinical Chemistry, 1991
- Chest pain evaluation unit: a cost-effective approach for ruling out acute myocardial infarction.1989
- AN AUDIT OF DOCTORS MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHEST PAIN IN THE ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT1989
- Continuous ST segment analysis for the detection of perioperative myocardial ischemiaCritical Care Medicine, 1988
- Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency roomThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Sensitivity of Routine Clinical Criteria for Diagnosing Myocardial Infarction Within 24 Hours of HospitalizationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Noninvasive detection of coronary artery patency using continuous ST-segment monitoringThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Use of the Initial Electrocardiogram to Predict In-Hospital Complications of Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978