Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Insulin (Exubera) Compared With Subcutaneous Insulin Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
Open Access
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 27 (11) , 2622-2627
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.11.2622
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—The aim of this study was to determine whether premeal pulmonary delivery of rapid-acting, dry-powder insulin (Exubera) plus Ultralente could provide glycemic control comparable to a conventional insulin regimen in type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Three hundred thirty-five subjects were randomly assigned to receive either premeal inhaled insulin plus bedtime Ultralente or two to three injections of regular and NPH insulin for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a change in HbA1c. RESULTS—Mean decreases in HbA1c values were comparable for inhaled (8.1–7.9%) and conventional groups (8.1–7.7%) (adjusted treatment group difference 0.16% [95% CI −0.01 to 0.32]). There were greater reductions for inhaled versus conventional regimen in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose (adjusted mean change differences −25.17 and −30.28 mg/dl, respectively [95% CI −43.39 to −6.95 and −54.58 to −5.97, respectively]). Hypoglycemia (events/subject month) was lower for the inhaled (8.6) versus the conventional (9.0) group (risk ratio, 0.96 [95% CI 0.93–0.99]). In subjects receiving inhaled insulin, increased insulin antibody levels were observed, but there were no associated clinical or laboratory changes. Adverse events were comparable between groups. Mild to moderate cough was more frequent in the inhaled insulin group (27 vs. 5%) but decreased during the treatment. Pulmonary function tests were not different between the groups except for a greater decrease in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity in the inhaled insulin group. Treatment satisfaction was greater in the inhaled than in the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS—Inhaled insulin is effective, well tolerated, and well accepted in patients with type 1 diabetes and provides glycemic control comparable to that with a conventional insulin regimen.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2003
- Development and factor analysis of a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with injected and inhaled insulin for type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Care, 2000
- Inhaled insulin1Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; AIDs, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; SC, subcutaneous; DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; IDDM, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; NIDDM, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; i.v., intravenous; DDPC, di-decanoyl-alpha-phosphatidylcholine; AUC, area under the curve; INH, inhaled; Cmax, maximum serum concentration; Cmin, minimum serum concentration; Tmax, time of maximum serum concentration; NS, not significant; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; OA, oral agent; SD, standard deviation; MDI, metered dose inhaler; DPI, dry powder inhaler; MMAD, mass median aerodynamic diameter; CMC, critical micelle concentration; SR, sustained release; PLGA, poly lactic acid-co-glycolic acid; GI, gastrointestinal, GSD, geometric standard deviation; TLC, total lung capacity; VC, vital capacity; SMK, smokers; MW, molecular weight; MP, melting point.1Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1999
- Diabetes Mellitus and ExerciseDiabetes Care, 1998
- Immunogenicity of intraperitoneal insulin infusion using programmable implantable devicesDiabetologia, 1995
- Immunogenicity of Long-Term Intraperitoneal Insulin Administration With Implantable Programmable Pumps: Metabolic consequencesDiabetes Care, 1995
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The Effect of Long-Term Intensified Insulin Treatment on the Development of Microvascular Complications of Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- (D) Routes of delivery: Case studiesAdvanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1992
- Lung Function Testing: Selection of Reference Values and Interpretative StrategiesAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1991