A Comprehensive Assessment of the Difficulty Level and Cultural Sensitivity of Online Cancer Prevention Resources for Older Minority Men
- 15 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 5 (1) , A07
Abstract
Older men are at increased risk for prostate cancer. As seniors turn to the Internet for cancer information, it is important that the resources they locate about lifestyle behaviors and screening are culturally appropriate and easy to understand. This study was a comprehensive analysis of prostate cancer risk as portrayed on the Internet with assessment of content readability and cultural sensitivity. We selected Web sites about prostate cancer risk and prevention by comparing common sites across three top-rated search engines (Google, Yahoo!, and MSN). A total of 70 Web sites on prostate cancer containing a Web page on risk factors or prevention or both for racial and ethnic populations were included. We assessed readability of one page per Web site using Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Flesch-Kincaid (FK), and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) measures. Cultural sensitivity of the Web page was evaluated using the Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool (CSAT) and questions from a cultural sensitivity checklist. Mean readability of Web pages was Grade 12.90 (high school graduate level) using SMOG and Grade 11.20 according to FK. Mean FRE was 45.04 (fairly difficult to read). The mean CSAT score was 2.78 and classified as culturally sensitive. Of the 36 Web pages considered culturally sensitive (CSAT >2.50), 75% did not portray images of representative racial or ethnic individuals as intended readers or as being at high risk for prostate cancer. Older adults and seniors were identified as intended readers on 73% of Web pages. Online cancer resources are targeting appropriate age groups (high-risk older adults). However, the pages required fairly high-level reading skills and had limited cultural sensitivity. These factors make the pages unsuitable for diverse Internet users.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- To screen or not to screen: factors influencing the decision to participate in prostate cancer screening among urban African-American men.2006
- Factors That Predict Treatment Choice and Satisfaction with the Decision in Men with Localized Prostate CancerClinical Genitourinary Cancer, 2006
- Internet Chat Rooms: Connecting With a New Generation of Young Men of Color at Risk for HIV Infection Who Have Sex With Other MenJournal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 2006
- A Systematic Review of Readability and Comprehension Instruments Used for Print and Web-Based Cancer InformationHealth Education & Behavior, 2006
- Unwanted control: how patients in the primary care setting decide about screening for prostate cancerPatient Education and Counseling, 2005
- Disparities in the coverage of cancer information in ethnic minority and mainstream mass print media.2005
- What we thought we knew: African American males' perceptions of prostate cancer and screening methods.2002
- Health Literacy and Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Patients with Low Socioeconomic StatusCancer Investigation, 2001
- One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materialsAnnals of Behavioral Medicine, 1999
- A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948