OPEN-SET MINIMUM AUDITORY CAPABILITY SCORES FOR HOUSE AND NUCLEUS COCHLEAR PROSTHESES
- 1 July 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Otology & Neurotology
- Vol. 10 (4) , 263-266
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-198907000-00004
Abstract
This study addresses the following questions: Is there a diference in open-set recognition among patients using House and Nucleus devices? How many subjects are needed to determine statistically significant differences between devices? The subjects were 12 patients, six with House and six with Nucleus cochlear prostheses. Using open-set tests from the Minimum Auditory Capabilities Battery, the Nucleus group had significantly better scores than the House device group. Our sample size was adequate in part because the House device group scored near zero. To determine moderate differences between groups with scores of 10% or better, approximately 20 paired or 60 unpaired subjects would be needed in each group.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Speech Recognition for 40 Patients Receiving Multichannel Cochlear ImplantsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1986
- Previous Experience as a Confounding Factor in Comparing Cochlear-Implant Processing SchemesJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1986
- Interim Assessment of Candidates for Cochlear ImplantsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1982