A Theoretical Analysis of the “Green Lobby”
- 1 March 1985
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 79 (1) , 132-147
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1956123
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to develop a theoretical framework for analyzing why individuals support private environmental “public interest” groups. The model attempts to integrate past contributions which have argued that these decisions could be explained by one of several factors, including: bounded rationality and imperfect information (Moe, 1980); the features of the public goods provided (or influenced by) these groups (Mitchell, 1979); the existence of a disequilibrium in households' demands for public goods (Weisbrod, 1977); or as a response to contract failures (Hansmann, 1980). The article uses a theoretical framework originally developed to explain individuals' decisions to join private clubs and specifies the conditions for the efficient provision of access to different types of private, nonprofit groups. By describing the optimal access conditions as if individuals could be coordinated to assure this efficient outcome, the model provides insights into the benefits and costs associated with membership in the environmental groups in practice.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Theory of Non-Profit FirmsEconomica, 1983
- How Nonprofits Grow: A ModelJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1983
- Voluntary Pressure GroupsEconomica, 1981
- Nonprofit Enterprise in the Performing ArtsThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1981
- Two Remarks on Optimal Club SizeEconomica, 1977
- Provision of Collective Goods As a Function of Group SizeAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Group Segregation and Optimal JurisdictionsJournal of Political Economy, 1974
- Market Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-ProtectionJournal of Political Economy, 1972
- Discount Rates for Public Investment under UncertaintyInternational Economic Review, 1972
- The relevance of Pareto optimalityJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1962