Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) Lobectomy for Pathologic Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparative Study with Thoracotomy Lobectomy
Open Access
- 12 February 2011
- journal article
- Published by Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery in The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 44 (1) , 32-38
- https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2011.44.1.32
Abstract
Surgical treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be performed either by thoracotomy or by employing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of VATS lobectomy for pathologic stage I NSCLC. Between December 2003 and December 2007, 529 patients with pathologic stage I NSCLC underwent lobectomies (373 thoracotomy, 156 VATS). Patients in both groups were selected after being matched by age, gender and pathologic stage using propensity score method, to create two comparable groups: thoracotomy and VATS groups, and the overall survival, recurrence-free survival, complication and length of hospitalization were compared between these two groups. After the patients were matched by age, gender and pathologic stage, 272 patients remained eligible for analysis, 136 in each group (mean age of 59.5 years; 70 men, 66 women; 80 stage IA, 56 stage IB). There was no statistical difference in other preoperative clinical characteristics between the two groups. No hospital mortality was observed in both groups. Overall 3-year survival rate was 97.4% in thoracotomy group and 96.6% in VATS groups (p=0.76). During the follow-up, 20 patients (14.7%) developed recurrence in thoracotomy group, including loco- regional recurrence in 7, distant metastasis in 13. In VATS group, 13 patients (9.6%) developed recurrence, including loco-regional recurrence in 4, distant metastasis in 9. Three-year recurrence-free survival rate was 81.8% in thoracotomy group and 85.3% in VATS groups (p=0.43). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between thoracotomy and VATS groups (30 cases in 22 patients vs. 19 cases in 17 patients, p=0.65, odds ratio=1.19). The mean hospital stay of VATS group was 2 days shorter than that of thoracotomy group (8.8±6.5 days vs. 6.3±3.3 days, p<0.05). VATS lobectomy for pathologic stage I lung cancer is a feasible operation with shorter hospitalization, while surgical outcome is comparable to thoracotomy lobectomy.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancerThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009
- Thoracoscopic lobectomy: Report on safety, discharge independence, pain, and chemotherapy toleranceThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2008
- Data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database: The surgical management of primary lung tumorsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2008
- Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy: Report of CALGB 39802—A Prospective, Multi-Institution Feasibility StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for c-T1N0M0 Primary Lung Cancer: Its Impact on Locoregional ControlThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2006
- Long-term outcomes after a variety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy approaches for clinical stage IA lung cancer: A multi-institutional studyThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006
- What is the advantage of a thoracoscopic lobectomy over a limited thoracotomy procedure for lung cancer surgery?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Complications of video-assisted thoracic surgery: A five-year experienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1996
- Lobectomy—video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy: A randomized trialThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1995
- Thoracoscopic implantation of cancer with a fatal outcomeThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995