Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 37 (1) , 39-45
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.37.1.39
Abstract
Thirteen laboratories collaborated to optimize interlaboratory agreement of results of a broth macrodilution procedure for testing three classes of antifungal drugs against pathogenic yeasts. The activities of amphotericin B, flucytosine, and ketoconazole were tested against 100 coded isolates of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida lusitaniae, Torulopsis (Candida) glabrata, and Cryptococcus neoformans. Two starting yeast inoculum sizes (5 x 10(4) and 2.5 x 10(3) cells per ml) were compared, and readings were taken after 24 and 48 h of incubation. All other test conditions were standardized. The resultant turbidities in all tubes were estimated visually on a scale from 0 to 4+ turbidity, and MIC-0, MIC-1, and MIC-2 were defined as the lowest drug concentrations that reduced growth to 0, 1+, or 2+ turbidity, respectively. For flucytosine, agreement among laboratories varied between 57 and 87% for different inocula, times of incubation, and end point criteria. Agreement was maximized (85%) when the lower inoculum was incubated for 2 days and the MICs were defined as 1+ turbidity or less. For amphotericin B, variations in test conditions produced much smaller differences in interlaboratory agreement. For ketoconazole, interlaboratory agreement was poorer by all end point criteria. However, MIC-2 endpoints distinguished T. glabrata as resistant compared with the other species. Overall, the studies indicated that readings from the lower inoculum obtained on the second day of reading result in the greatest interlaboratory agreement. In combination with data from previous multicenter studies (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Committee Report, Vol. 5, No. 17, 1988; M. A. Pfaller, L. Burmeister, M. S. Bartlett, and M. G. Rinaldi, J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:1437-1441, 1988; M. A. Pfaller, M. G. Rinaldi, J. N. Galgiani, M. S. Bartlett, B.A. Body, A. Espinel-Ingroff, R.A. Fromtling, G.S. Hall, C.E. Hughes, F. C. Odds, and A. M. SUgar, J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1648-1654, 1990), these findings will be used by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards to develop a standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing for yeasts.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increase inCandida kruseiInfection among Patients with Bone Marrow Transplantation and Neutropenia Treated Prophylactically with FluconazoleNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Emergence ofCandida krusei infections after therapy of oropharyngeal candidiasis with fluconazoleEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Failure of fluconazole therapy inCandida krusei fungemiaEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Failure of Fluconazole to Suppress Fungemia in a Patient with Fever, Neutropenia, and TyphlitisThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1991
- The use of biotyping and DNA fingerprinting in typing Canadida albicans from hospitalized patientsDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1990
- In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antifungal agentsEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1989
- Drug Resistance in Candida albicans and Candida glabrataaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988
- Fungal Infections in Cancer PatientsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988
- FLUCONAZOLE RESISTANCE IN CANDIDA GLABRATAThe Lancet, 1988
- In-vitro resistance to imidazole antifungals in Candida albicansJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1984