Meta-Analysis of randomized trials of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus atherectomy, cutting balloon atherotomy, or laser angioplasty
Open Access
- 11 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 43 (6) , 936-942
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.039
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rotational Atherectomy Does Not Reduce Recurrent In-Stent RestenosisCirculation, 2002
- Final Results of the Balloon vs Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT)Circulation, 1998
- Randomised trial of excimer laser angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of obstructive coronary artery diseaseThe Lancet, 1996
- Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Results of coronary angioplasty using the transluminal extraction catheterThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: Results in a porcine modelJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Percutaneous coronary mid-infra-red laser angioplastyAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Effect of lesion characteristics on outcome of directional coronary atherectomyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
- Percutaneous coronary rotational angioplasty in humans: Preliminary reportJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- PERCUTANEOUS EXCIMER LASER CORONARY ANGIOPLASTYThe Lancet, 1989