Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications
- 27 January 1990
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 20 (1) , 119-131
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400005731
Abstract
Success and even survival in politics frequently depends on the ability of politicians and public officials to extricate themselves from various types of predicaments. Indeed, politicians are particularly adept at extricating themselves, with a wide range of explanations at their disposal to avoid blame for unpopular actions and decisions. However, there has been little systematic research on the effectiveness of various political blame-avoidance strategies. This Note has two purposes. First, a typology of blame-avoidance strategies, or accounts, is developed. Second, the results of an experiment examine the effectiveness of these various accounts in enhancing evaluations of a hypothetical public official are reported.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Television News and Citizens' Explanations of National AffairsAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- The Politics of Blame AvoidanceJournal of Public Policy, 1986
- Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political BehaviorAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1985
- The Attribution of BlamePublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- The Perplexing Borders of Justification and ExcuseColumbia Law Review, 1984
- Choices, values, and frames.American Psychologist, 1984
- The person-positivity bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many HandsAmerican Political Science Review, 1980
- AccountsAmerican Sociological Review, 1968
- I.—A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential AddressProceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), 1957