Adenosine infusion for the reversal of pulmonary vasoconstriction in biventricular failure. A good test but a poor therapy.
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- abstracts
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 86 (3) , 896-902
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.86.3.896
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance is an important determinant of right ventricular function in patients with end-stage biventricular heart failure. Vasodilator drug therapy directed at the pulmonary vasculature is used in the hemodynamic assessment of patients for orthotopic heart transplantation, and therapy aimed at decreasing pulmonary vascular resistance and transpulmonary pressure gradient has been advocated in patients awaiting heart transplantation. Adenosine infusion has been shown to cause selective pulmonary vasodilatation in normal subjects and in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension but has not been assessed in patients with biventricular heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS Using two infusion doses, we studied the pulmonary and renal hemodynamic effects of adenosine on patients referred for heart transplantation (n = 21) and compared it with sodium nitroprusside (n = 18). Patients received 30% oxygen via face mask throughout the study. Adenosine at 100 micrograms/kg min achieved the same percentage fall in pulmonary vascular resistance as nitroprusside (41 +/- 6% versus 42 +/- 4%) and a greater and more consistent fall in transpulmonary pressure gradient (35 +/- 6% versus 9 +/- 30%, p less than 0.02). The mean arterial blood pressure fell by 16 mm Hg with nitroprusside but was unchanged by adenosine, indicating that in contrast to nitroprusside, adenosine acted as a selective pulmonary vasodilator. Despite this, cardiac index showed only a modest increase with adenosine (1.73 +/- 0.09 to 1.89 +/- 0.16 l.m-2, p less than 0.05), and there was a rise in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure from baseline at the higher dose (29.7 +/- 2.5 to 33.4 +/- 3.4 mm Hg, p less than 0.05). Renal blood flow was unchanged during adenosine infusion. CONCLUSIONS Adenosine is a potent selective pulmonary vasodilator in patients with biventricular heart failure and is preferable to sodium nitroprusside as a test for the reversibility of pulmonary vasoconstriction. However, its deleterious effects on left atrial pressure make it unsuitable as a therapeutic agent in patients awaiting heart transplantation.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of bedside measurements of absolute human renal blood flow by a continuous thermodilution techniqueCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- Reversibility of pulmonary hypertension in congestive heart failure patients evaluated for cardiac transplantation: Comparative effects of various pharmacologic agentsAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Regulation of the renal circulationKidney International, 1990
- Analysis of morbid events and risk factors for death after cardiac transplantationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Effects of adenosine on autonomic control of heart rate in manActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1987
- Cardiovascular effects of infused adenosine in man: potentiation by dipyridamoleActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1987
- Pulmonary versus systemic hemodynamics in determining exercise capacity of patients with chronic left ventricular failureAmerican Heart Journal, 1985
- Central and regional hemodynamic effects of intravenous isosorbide dinitrate, nitroglycerin and nitroprusside in patients with congestive heart failureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1981
- Renal effects of adenosine and their inhibition by theophylline in dogsNaunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 1975
- Performance of the right ventricle under stress: relation to right coronary flowJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1971