Thought-induced change in phobic beliefs: Sometimes it helps, sometimes it hurts
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Psychology
Abstract
Derived two predictions from Tesser's (1978) work on thought‐induced polarization. First, the longer individuals thought in a constrained manner about a phobic object, the more strongly they would believe that they were able to cope with the object. Second, the longer individuals thought in an unconstrained manner about a phobic object, the more strongly they would believe that they were unable to cope with the object. It was also predicted that, in both cases, the relationship between thought and belief change would be monotonic. These hypotheses were tested by randomly assigning phobic individuals (N = 20) to one of two treatment conditions: Constrained thought or unconstrained thought. Beliefs about extra‐laboratory behavior were used to assess the effects of treatment, and results supported all predictions.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Affect control: Process Constraints versus CatharsisCognitive Therapy and Research, 1978
- Some attitudinal and cognitive consequences of thoughtJournal of Research in Personality, 1977
- Attitude polarization as a function of thought and reality constraintsJournal of Research in Personality, 1976
- Some effects of time and thought on attitude polarization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Some Effects of Salience and Time Upon Interpersonal Hostility and Attraction During Social IsolationSociometry, 1973
- The development of a scale to measure fearBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1965