Different Functions of "Alarm" Calling for Different Time Scales: a Preliminary Report On Ground Squirrels
- 1 January 1986
- Vol. 99 (1-2) , 101-116
- https://doi.org/10.1163/156853986x00432
Abstract
The predator-evoked calling of California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) was studied in the field during the reproductive season. Three different sources of data indicated that adults call more after, than before their young have reached the age of first emergence from natal burrows. During exposure to a tethered rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis oreganus) and to a freely-moving dog (Canis familiaris), and in natural encounters with a coyote (Canis latrans) or bobcat (Lynx rufus), calling was more frequent after than before young first emerged. We concluded that California ground squirrels call in order to warn their offspring about predators, like other ground squirrel species do. In order to see the increase in mammalian predator evoked calling after pup emergence, we had to separate calling on the basis of its temporal organization. Nonrepetitive calling involved spacing a few vocalizations irregularly in time. Calls patterned in this way were more common early in an encounter, became more frequent after pup emergence, and more consistently elicited immediate reactions. Such calling was probably used to warn pups. Repetitive calling comprised rhythmic emission of a series of vocalizations. Calls organized repetitively were more common later in an encounter, were not emitted more frequently after pup emergence, and less consistently evoked immediate reactions. These and other differences between the two temporal patterns of vocalizing led us to propose that repetitive calling represented a "tonic" communicatory effort (as in SCHLEIDT, 1973). Repetitive inputs to other squirrels may act "cumulatively" in a longer time scale than nonrepetitive calling, so as to cultivate or maintain vigilance in other squirrels. The repetitive caller could benefit by using the enhanced reactions of these more vigilant squirrels as a source of information about the predator. We propose that predator-prey episodes may be understandable from an "epigenetic" perspective. That is, the first alarm calls during an encounter should shift squirrels from an unwarned to a warned status; subsequent calling must then function in some other way than as a warning.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alarm calls of Belding's ground squirrels to aerial predators: nepotism or self-preservation?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1985
- AERODYNAMICS, THERMOREGULATION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF INSECT WINGS: DIFFERENTIAL SCALING AND EVOLUTIONARY CHANGEEvolution, 1985
- Nepotism and alarm calling in the black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus)Animal Behaviour, 1983
- The Information Afforded By a Variable Signal: Constraints On Snake-Elicited Tail Flagging By California Ground SquirrelsBehaviour, 1981
- Parental investment in nest defence by stonechats (Saxicola torquata)Animal Behaviour, 1980
- Snake Species Discrimination and the Role of Olfactory Cues in the Snake-Directed Behavior of the California Ground SquirrelBehaviour, 1978
- Nepotism and the Evolution of Alarm CallsScience, 1977
- Vocalizations of the black-tailed prairie dog, Cynomys ludovicianusAnimal Behaviour, 1977
- Snake Mobbing By California Ground Squirrels: Adaptive Variation and OntogenyBehaviour, 1977
- Behaviour in a population of Columbian ground squirrels, Spermophilus columbianus columbianusAnimal Behaviour, 1976