Models of Decisionmaking Processes for Multiple‐Choice Test Items: An Analysis of Spatial Ability
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Educational Measurement
- Vol. 25 (2) , 125-136
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00297.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Life of the mind: The interface of psychopharmaceuticals, domestic economies, and social abandonmentAmerican Ethnologist, 2004
- An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significanceBiometrika, 1986
- An Approximation of the K out N Reliability of a Test, and a Scoring Procedure for Determining which Items an Examinee KnowsPsychometrika, 1983
- SOME NEW RESULTS ON AN ANSWER‐UNTIL‐CORRECT SCORING PROCEDUREJournal of Educational Measurement, 1982
- A closed sequential procedure for comparing the binomial distribution to a standardBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1981
- Error rate for testing a contrast after a significant F testCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 1981
- A TEST OF LORD'S ASSUMPTION REGARDING EXAMINEE GUESSING BEHAVIOR ON MULTIPLE‐CHOICE TESTS USING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1980
- An Empirical Investigation of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Sparse MultinomialsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1980
- AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF LORD'S THEORETICAL RESULTS REGARDING FORMULA SCORING OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1977
- 375: Type I Error Rates When Multiple Comparison Procedures Follow a Significant F Test of ANOVAPublished by JSTOR ,1975