Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 438 (7068) , 658-661
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04030
Abstract
The recurrent patterns in the commonness and rarity of species in ecological communities—the relative species abundance—have puzzled ecologists for more than half a century1,2. Here we show that the framework of the current neutral theory in ecology3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 can easily be generalized to incorporate symmetric density dependence11,12,13,14. We can calculate precisely the strength of the rare-species advantage that is needed to explain a given RSA distribution. Previously, we demonstrated that a mechanism of dispersal limitation also fits RSA data well3,4. Here we compare fits of the dispersal and density-dependence mechanisms for empirical RSA data on tree species in six New and Old World tropical forests and show that both mechanisms offer sufficient and independent explanations. We suggest that RSA data cannot by themselves be used to discriminate among these explanations of RSA patterns15—empirical studies will be required to determine whether RSA patterns are due to one or the other mechanism, or to some combination of both.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sampling Hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversityEcology Letters, 2004
- Clustering in neutral ecologyPhysical Review E, 2003
- Analytical solution of a neutral model of biodiversityPhysical Review E, 2003
- Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecologyNature, 2003
- Neutral MacroecologyScience, 2001
- Mean-field stochastic theory for species-rich assembled communitiesPhysical Review E, 2000
- The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral CommunitiesThe American Naturalist, 2000
- Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical ForestsThe American Naturalist, 1970
- The Commonness, And Rarity, of SpeciesEcology, 1948
- The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal PopulationJournal of Animal Ecology, 1943