Evaluation of Peripheral Arterial Bypass Grafts with Multi–Detector Row CT Angiography: Comparison with Duplex US and Digital Subtraction Angiography
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 229 (2) , 465-474
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2292021123
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the technical feasibility of multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial bypass grafts and to evaluate its accuracy and reliability in the detection of graft-related complications, including graft stenosis, aneurysmal changes, and arteriovenous fistulas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four-channel multi–detector row CT angiography was performed in 65 consecutive patients with 85 peripheral arterial bypass grafts. Each bypass graft was divided into three segments (proximal anastomosis, course of the graft body, and distal anastomosis), resulting in 255 segments. Two readers evaluated all CT angiograms with regard to image quality and the presence of bypass graft–related abnormalities, including graft stenosis, aneurysmal changes, and arteriovenous fistulas. The results were compared with McNemar test with Bonferroni correction. CT attenuation values were recorded at five different locations from the inflow artery to the outflow artery of the bypass graft. These findings were compared with the findings at duplex ultrasonography (US) in 65 patients and the findings at conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 27. RESULTS: Image quality was rated as good or excellent in 250 (98%) and in 252 (99%) of 255 bypass segments, respectively. There was excellent agreement both between readers and between CT angiography and duplex US in the detection of graft stenosis, aneurysmal changes, and arteriovenous fistulas (κ = 0.86–0.99). CT angiography and duplex US were compared with conventional DSA, and there was no statistically significant difference (P > .25) in sensitivity or specificity between CT angiography and duplex US for both readers for detection of hemodynamically significant bypass stenosis or occlusion, aneurysmal changes, or arteriovenous fistulas. Mean CT attenuation values ranged from 232 HU in the inflow artery to 281 HU in the outflow artery of the bypass graft. CONCLUSION: Multi–detector row CT angiography may be an accurate and reliable technique after duplex US in the assessment of peripheral arterial bypass grafts and detection of graft-related complications, including stenosis, aneurysmal changes, and arteriovenous fistulas. © RSNA, 2003Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Arterial Bypass Grafts of the Pelvic and Lower Extremities With Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance AngiographyInvestigative Radiology, 2002
- Surveillance of Peripheral Arterial Bypass Grafts with Three-Dimensional MR AngiographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Arteriovenous fistulas aggravate the hemodynamic effect of vein bypass stenoses: An in vitro studyJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Surveillance of infrainguinal vein grafts with duplex sonography.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1994
- Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical X-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area productPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1992
- The role of colour flow duplex screening in infra-inguinal vein graftsEuropean Journal of Vascular Surgery, 1992
- Color-flow duplex criteria for grading stenosis in infrainguinal vein graftsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1991
- Nonreversed and In Situ Vein Grafts Clinical and Experimental ObservationsAnnals of Surgery, 1985
- Secondary Femoropopliteal ReconstructionAnnals of Surgery, 1981