Treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and antibiotics that inhibit cell wall synthesis
- 1 April 1995
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 39 (4) , 953-957
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.39.4.953
Abstract
Using two strains of Staphylococcus aureus, one susceptible and one heterogeneously resistant to methicillin, for which MICs and MBCs of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) were 0.06 and 0.06 micrograms/ml and 0.06 and 0.25 microgram/ml, respectively (concentrations are those of TMP), we studied the efficacies of TMP-SMX and cloxacillin, teicoplanin, and vancomycin for treatment of experimental staphylococcal endocarditis. Rabbits were treated with dosages of TMP-SMX selected to achieve concentrations in serum equivalent to that obtained in humans treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. The overall mortality rate of rabbits treated with TMP-SMX was 84% at day 3, not different from that of the control groups (P > 0.1). No sterile vegetations were observed to be present in control groups or in animals treated with TMP-SMX. However, 26, 60, and 75% of rabbits treated with teicoplanin, cloxacillin, and vancomycin, respectively, showed sterile vegetations. For methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), the mean vegetation counts were not significantly different between the control group and the group treated with TMP-SMX (P > 0.1). For methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), treatment with TMP-SMX was more effective than no therapy, decreasing the number of organisms in vegetations (P < 0.01). For both strains, therapy with cloxacillin and therapy with teicoplanin or vancomycin were significantly more effective than therapy with TMP-SMX. Despite high concentrations of teicoplanin in serum which exceeded MBCs for staphylococci more than 50 times at the peak and 10 times at the trough, therapy with cloxacillin or vancomycin was superior to therapy with teicoplanin against both MSSA and MRSA. These data do not support the use of TMP-SMX in treatment of endocarditis and other severe staphylococcal infections with high bacterial counts.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increasing Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United StatesInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1990
- WORLD-WIDE ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUSThe Lancet, 1989
- In-vitro and in-vivo studies of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole against multiple resistant Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1988
- Experience with Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in Treatment of Infective EndocarditisClinical Infectious Diseases, 1988
- Absence of a Postantibiotic Effect in Experimental Pseudomonas Endocarditis Treated With Imipenem, With or Without GentamicinThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1988
- Co-trimoxazole versus nafcillin in the therapy of experimental meningitis due to Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1987
- Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Treatment of Multiantibiotic-Resistant Staphylococcal Endocarditis and MeningitisClinical Pediatrics, 1982
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole)Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 1980
- EXPERIMENTAL ENDOCARDITIS*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1974
- Bacterial endocarditis over prosthetic valves treated with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole combination.Heart, 1971