Predator foraging success and habitat complexity: quantitative test of the threshold hypothesis
- 31 July 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 80 (2) , 158-166
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00380145
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated a negative relationship between increasing habitat complexity and predator foraging success. Results from many of these studies suggest a non-linear relationship, and it has been hypothesised that some “threshold level” of complexity is required before foraging success is reduced significantly. We examined this hypothesis using largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) foraging on juvenile bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) in various densities of artificial vegetation. Largemouth foraging success differed significantly among the densities of vegetation tested. Regression analysis revealed a non-linear relationship between increasing plant stem density and predator foraging success. Logistic analysis demonstrated a significant fit of our data to a logistic model, from which was calculated the threshold level of plant stem desity necessary to reduce predator foraging success. Studies with various prey species have shown selection by prey for more complex habitats as a refuge from predation. In this stydy, we also examined the effects of increasing habitat complexity (i.e. plant stem density) on choice of habitat by juvenile bluegills while avoiding predation. Plant stem density significantly effected choice of habitat as a refuge. The relationship between increasing habitat complexity and prey choice of habitat was found to be positive and non-linear. As with predator foraging success, logistic analysis demonstrated a significant fit of our data to a logistic model. Using this model we calculated the “threshold” level of habitat complexity required before prey select a habitat as a refuge. This density of vegetation proved to be considerably higher than that necessary to significantly reduce predator foraging success, indicating that bluegill select habitats safe from predation. Implications of these results and various factors which may affect the relationships described are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abundance of macrofauna in dense seagrass is due to habitat preference, not predationOecologia, 1986
- Fish predation on Notonecta (Hemiptera): relationship between prey risk and habitat utilizationOecologia, 1984
- Community unity: Experimental evidence for meiofauna and macrofaunaJournal of Marine Research, 1984
- Optimal Foraging by Largemouth Bass in Structured EnvironmentsEcology, 1984
- Vulnerability of Redbelly Tilapia Fry to Bluegill Predation with Changes in Cover AvailabilityNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1984
- Refuges from Fish Predation: Experiments with Phytal Meiofauna from the New Zealand Rocky IntertidalEcology, 1983
- Habitat Structural Complexity and the Interaction Between Bluegills and Their PreyEcology, 1982
- Experiments on Competition and Predation Among Shrimps of Seagrass MeadowsEcology, 1981
- An experimental study on the effects of grazing by parrotfishes and role of refuges in benthic community structureMarine Biology, 1979
- Role of form vision in habitat selection of the grass shrimp Hippolyte californiensisMarine Biology, 1974