Comparative study between valve repair and replacement for mitral pure regurgitation. Early and late postoperative results.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
From May 1975 through December 1988, 91 patients (mean age 50.4 +/- 12.8 years) had first-time surgery for mitral pure regurgitation; 48 had mitral valve replacement (MVR) and 43 had valve repair. A majority of the patients had non-rheumatic valvular diseases. Those patients who underwent repair had less hemodynamic and functional derangement than those who underwent MVR. The operative mortality was 8.3% in the MVR group and 2.3% in the repair group. Seventeen percent of the MVR group and 2% of the repair group required intra-aortic balloon pumping support (p less than 0.03). A higher dose of dopamine and/or dobutamine during the early postoperative period was necessary in the MVR group (7.0 +/- 4.8 micrograms/kg/min) than in the repair group (5.1 +/- 3.1 micrograms/kg/min). Duration of respirator support for hospital survivors was longer in the MVR group (2.3 +/- 2.7 days) than in the repair group (1.4 +/- 1.0 days). There were 5 late deaths (2.2 +/- 1.0%/pt-yr) not counting 6 non-cardiac deaths in the MVR group and 1 (0.6 +/- 0.6%/pt-yr) in the repair group. There were 17 patients (7.5 +/- 1.8%/pt-yr) who experienced treatment failure in the MVR group and 5 (2.3 +/- 1.3%/pt-yr) in the repair group (p less than 0.02). Eight patients in the MVR group (3.5 +/- 1.3%/pt-yr) underwent repeat surgery in the late postoperative period, as did 3 (1.7 +/- 1.0%/pt-yr) in the repair group. There was no increase in the incidence of repeat surgery after valve repair. All the current survivors in the repair group, and 96% of those in the MVR group were in NYHA functional class I or II. These results indicate that mitral repair is the preferred operative procedure for pure mitral regurgitation, whenever it is possible.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: