Cost-Effective Means of Diagnosing and Following Benign and Malignant Gastric Ulcers
- 1 March 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Investigative Radiology
- Vol. 20 (2) , 171-176
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198503000-00014
Abstract
To define the most cost-effective means of diagnosing and following gastric ulcers, both benign and malignant, the University of Utah Medical Center (UUMC) [USA] experience between Sept. 1980 and Oct. 1983 was reviewed. Endoscopy (EGD) was utilized in the initial evaluation process in 96% of patients. Follow-up was performed by either a combination of EGD and double contrast upper GI [gastrointestine] (DCUGI) or EGD alone. Diagnostic and follow-up modality had no effect on survival. The high-frequency use of EGD for gastric ulcer management is not cost-effective. An algorithm in which EGD would be used only following failure either to demonstrate characteristic benign appearance on DCUGI or inadequate healing following therapeutic trial is suggested. A theoretical net savings of 55% is calculated by retrospective application of the algorithm to the UUMC experience; 30% savings is realized for diagnosis and 81% for follow-up. If adopted on a national scale, the algorithm proposed may result in a significant savings in health-care cost.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Benign gastric ulcer: a reliable radiologic diagnosis?American Journal of Roentgenology, 1983
- The double-contrast barium meal: A correlation with endoscopyClinical Radiology, 1983
- The sensitivity of radiography of the postoperative stomach.Radiology, 1982
- Gastric cancer detection in gastric ulcer disease.Gut, 1980
- DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC PREPYLORIC AND ANTRAL LESIONS - COMPARISON OF FIBERENDOSCOPY AND GASTRIC BIOPSY WITH RADIOLOGY1976