Low work function and surface structure of the LaB6(210) surface studied by angle-resolved x-ray spectroscopy, ultraviolet spectroscopy, and low-energy electron diffraction
- 1 February 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AIP Publishing in Journal of Applied Physics
- Vol. 51 (2) , 997-1000
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.327681
Abstract
A clean surface of LaB6(210) exhibits the low work function of 2.2±0.1 eV at room temperature. This is lower than those of the (100), (110), and (111) surfaces. Similarly to the (100) surface, La atoms exist in a (1×1) ordered structure at the outermost layer of the (210) clean surface. The value of the low work function of LaB6 has been discussed on the basis of those data together with the Lang‐Kohn theory. The changes of the (210) surface with oxygen chemisorption are more analogous to those of the (110) surface than the (100) and (111) surface. Work function changes from 2.2 to 3.1 eV with oxygen exposure and saturates above ∼15 L; the periodicity of the surface‐atomic lattice disappears almost completely.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Design and optimization of directly heated LaB6 cathode assemblies for electron-beam instrumentsJournal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 1978
- Structure of the LaB (001) surface studied by angle-resolved XPS and LEEDJournal of Applied Physics, 1978
- Thermionic work function of LaB6 single crystals and their surfacesJournal of Applied Physics, 1977
- Work function of LaB6Applied Physics Letters, 1976
- Theory of Metal Surfaces: Charge Density and Surface EnergyPhysical Review B, 1970
- The electronic structure of the borides M B 6Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1954
- Anisotropy of the Electronic Work Function of MetalsPhysical Review B, 1941
- Theory of the Work Function. II. The Surface Double LayerPhysical Review B, 1936
- On the Constantin Richardson's EquationPhysical Review B, 1936
- Theory of the Work Functions of Monovalent MetalsPhysical Review B, 1935