Hemotherapy in Elective Surgery: An Incidence Report, Review of the Literature, and Alternatives for Guideline Appraisal
Open Access
- 1 August 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 74 (2) , 223-227
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/74.2.223
Abstract
The growing demand upon existing reserves of blood requires a more efficient use of this limited resource. Numerous regional medical centers have shown the current practice of type and crossmatch to be highly inefficient, whereas the proven, safe type and screen method for reserving blood units effectively increases the available blood pool and decreases costs of maintaining a blood bank. Approaches other than the crossmatch to transfusion ratio are proposed to provide objectivity for establishing procedures to be converted to type and screen and the appropriate number of units for patients requiring a type and crossmatch. Cumulative blood ordering recommendations are provided.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Guideline for Anticipated Blood Usage during Elective Surgical ProceduresAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1979
- The Type and Antibody Screen, RevisitedAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1979
- Expected hemotherapy in elective surgery. A follow-upJAMA, 1978
- The type and screen: a safe alternative and supplement in selected surgical proceduresTransfusion, 1977
- The Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule and Surgical Blood Use in the United StatesTransfusion, 1976