Length of Stay, Conditional Length of Stay, and Prolonged Stay in Pediatric Asthma
- 23 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Services Research
- Vol. 38 (3) , 867-886
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00150
Abstract
To understand differences in length of stay for asthma patients between New York State and Pennsylvania across children's and general hospitals in order to better guide policy. All pediatric admissions for asthma in the states of Pennsylvania and New York using claims data obtained from each state for the years 1996-1998, n = 38,310. A retrospective cohort design to model length of stay (LOS), the probability of prolonged stay, conditional length of stay (CLOS or the LOS after stay is prolonged), and the probability of readmission, controlling for patient factors, state, location and hospital type. ANALYTIC METHODS: Logit models were used to estimate the probability of prolonged stay and readmission. The LOS and the CLOS were estimated with Cox regression. Model variables included comorbidities, income, race, distance from hospital, and insurance type. Prolonged stay was based on a Hollander-Proschan "New-Worse-Than-Used" test, corresponding to a three-day stay. The LOS was longer in New York than Pennsylvania, and the probabilities of prolonged stay and readmission were much higher in New York than Pennsylvania. However, once an admission was prolonged, there were no differences in CLOS between states (when readmissions were not added to the LOS calculation). In both states, children's hospitals and general hospitals had similar adjusted LOS. Management of asthma appears more efficient in Pennsylvania than New York: Less severe patients are discharged faster in Pennsylvania than New York; once discharged, patients are less likely to be readmitted in Pennsylvania than New York. However, once a stay is prolonged, there is little difference between New York and Pennsylvania, suggesting medical care for severely ill patients is similar across states. Differences between children's and general hospitals were small as compared to differences between states. We conclude that policy initiatives in New York, and other states, should focus their efforts on improving the care provided to less severe patients in order to help reduce overall length of stay.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pediatric Length of Stay Guidelines and Routine PracticeArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2001
- Milliman and Robertson-going in the wrong direction.Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,2000
- Pediatric Milliman and Robertson Length-of-Stay Criteria: Are They Realistic?Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) ,2000
- Conditional Length of Stay.1999
- The Influence of Chronic Disease on Resource Utilization in Common Acute Pediatric ConditionsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1999
- An Analysis of 25 Milliman & Robertson Guidelines for SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 1998
- An Economic Evaluation of Asthma in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Childhood chronic illness: prevalence, severity, and impact.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- Testing Whether New is Better than UsedThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1972