Lipid Hemodialysis versus Charcoal Hemoperfusion in Imipramine Poisoning
- 1 January 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Clinical Toxicology
- Vol. 11 (2) , 211-219
- https://doi.org/10.3109/15563657708989834
Abstract
Previous experimental results have demonstrated the possibility of eliminating imipramine (14C-IP) by hemodialysis. A simultaneous uptake of the substance by the polyvinyl chloride extracorporeal blood lines could be shown. Based on these results the imipramine sorption capacity of the blood lines and artificial kidney (Hollow Fiber Artificial Kidney, HFAK, Model 4) were studied. Imipramine (IP) sorption capacity of a usual blood-line set (arterial and venous, surface area 86,000 mm3) was estimated to be 43 mg, and that of the HFAK 207 mg. Charcoal hemoperfusion (300 gm of coated activated coconut charcoal) eliminated > 90% of IP from the blood within 3 h if the initial IP blood concentration was 2 mg/ml. In comparison, lipid hemodialysis using 20% soybean oil as dialysate eliminated 95% of IP from the blood when the initial IP blood concentration was 1 mg/ml and 98% when the initial IP blood concentration was 2 mg/ml. In vivo studies on the elimination of IP by lipid (10%) hemodialysis demonstrated a substantial removal of the substance. Within 2 h of treatment, 12% of the administered dose (75% of the LD50) was eliminated.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Haemodialysis in imipramine poisoning?Journal of Molecular Medicine, 1976
- Amitriptyline and Imipramine Poisoning in ChildrenBMJ, 1974
- Hämodialysebehandlung bei einem 3 1/4jährigen Kind mit Imipramin-VergiftungArchives of Toxicology, 1970
- Acute Poisoning by Tricyclic Antidepressants: Clinical Features and Management of 100 PatientsClinical Toxicology, 1969
- Management of Massive Imipramine Overdosage with Mannitol and Artificial DialysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1963