Effects of intranasal inoculation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Bordetella bronchiseptica, or a combination of both organisms in pigs
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) in American Journal of Veterinary Research
- Vol. 61 (8) , 892-899
- https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.892
Abstract
Objective—To examine effects of co-infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) andBordetella bronchisepticain pigs.Animals—Forty 3-week-old pigs.Procedure—30 pigs (10 pigs/group) were inoculated with PRRSV,B bronchiseptica, or both. Ten noninoculated pigs were control animals.Results—Clinical signs, febrile response, and decreased weight gain were most severe in the group inoculated with both organisms. The PRRSV was isolated from all pigs in both groups inoculated with virus. All pigs in both groups that received PRRSV had gross and microscopic lesions consistent with interstitial pneumonia.Bordetella bronchisepticawas cultured from all pigs in both groups inoculated with that bacterium. Colonization of anatomic sites byB bronchisepticawas comparable between both groups. Pigs in the group that received onlyB bronchisepticalacked gross or microscopic lung lesions, andB bronchisepticawas not isolated from lung tissue. In the group inoculated withB bronchisepticaand PRRSV, 3 of 5 pigs 10 days after inoculation and 5 of 5 pigs 21 days after inoculation had gross and microscopic lesions consistent with bacterial bronchopneumonia, andB bronchisepticawas isolated from the lungs of 7 of those 10 pigs.Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Clinical disease was exacerbated in co-infected pigs, including an increased febrile response, decreased weight gain, andB bronchiseptica-induced pneumonia.Bordetella bronchisepticaand PRRSV may circulate in a herd and cause subclinical infections. Therefore, co-infection with these organisms may cause clinical respiratory tract disease and leave pigs more susceptible to subsequent infection with opportunistic bacteria. (Am J Vet Res2000;61:892–899)Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus does not exacerbate Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in young pigsVeterinary Microbiology, 1996
- Dual infections of feeder pigs with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus followed by porcine respiratory coronavirus or swine influenza virus: a clinical and virological studyVeterinary Microbiology, 1996
- Comparative Pathogenicity of Nine US Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Isolates in a Five-Week-Old Cesarean-Derived, Colostrum-Deprived Pig ModelJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 1996
- Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromeJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 1993
- Laboratory Investigation of PRRS Virus Infection in Three Swine HerdsJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 1993
- Endemic Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Infection of Nursery Pigs in Two Swine Herds without Current Reproductive FailureJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 1993
- Serologic Evidence Incriminating a Recently Isolated Virus (ATCC VR-2332) as the Cause of Swine Infertility and Respiratory Syndrome (SIRS)Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 1992
- Isolation of a Cytopathic Virus from Weak Pigs on Farms with a History of Swine Infertility and Respiratory SyndromeJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 1992
- The prevalence of Brodetella bronchiseptica and turbinate (conchal) atrophy in English pig herds in 1978-79Veterinary Record, 1980
- Bordetella bronchiseptica Infections in Germ-Free Swine: An Experimental PneumoniaVeterinary Pathology, 1973