Comparison of various methods for 3-D eddy current analysis

Abstract
Computer codes developed for the A-φ, A-φ-Ω, A-Ω, T-Ω, and E-Ω methods are considered. Their accuracy, storage requirements, and CPU time are compared for linear eddy-current models. It is shown that the A-φ-Ω and T-Ω methods are preferable from the viewpoint of accuracy. The A-Ω and E-Ω methods are preferable with respect to storage and CPU time</p