Economic policy essay: Vertical integration, monopoly, and the first amendment
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Media Economics
- Vol. 3 (1) , 57-76
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08997769009358191
Abstract
Tension between regulation of communication media and First Amendment values is explored by identifying conditions in which vertical integration by media monopolists into content provision will lead to changes in content. The author argues that although a profit maximizing monopolist is likely to raise prices, no predictable bias in content provision emerges, whether or not the monopolist is vertically integrated. More severe consequences attend integration by individuals or firms with non‐profit related motives or who expand into content markets to evade profit regulation.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Divestiture policy considerations in an information services worldTelecommunications Policy, 1989
- Regulating by capping pricesJournal of Regulatory Economics, 1989
- The value of information: Approaches in economics, accounting, and management scienceJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1989
- Cable Television and the Freedom of ExpressionDuke Law Journal, 1988
- Monopoly and Quality Distortion: Effects and RemediesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987
- Why Regulated Firms should be Kept out of Unregulated Markets: Understanding the Divestiture in United States v. AT&TThe Antitrust Bulletin, 1987
- On the Nonexistence of Pareto Superior Outlay SchedulesThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1980
- Structural Approaches to the Problem of Television Network Economic DominanceDuke Law Journal, 1979
- Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal IndustryThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1978
- The Theory of Economic RegulationThe Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1971