RECPAM analysis of prognostic factors in patients with Stage III breast cancer
- 1 October 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 16 (3) , 231-242
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01806331
Abstract
A retrospective chart review was conducted of women with stage III breast cancer seen at the Princess Margaret Hospital between January 1977 and December 1980. Three hundred and sixty-nine patients were available for analysis. These cases were evaluated to determine the prognostic factors of patients presenting with this stage of the disease using a recursive partitioning technique, RECPAM, and a Cox regression model. A non-mathematical description of RECPAM is presented and the advantages of RECPAM over Cox analysis are discussed. The results identify primary tumour size, axillary node involvement, internal mammary node involvement, and estrogen receptor status as the most important prognostic variables. RECPAM identified 3 prognostic groups and simultaneously provided rules based on the prognostic variables to assign patients to poor, intermediate, or good prognosis categories. Patients with estrogen receptor negative tumours, or those with axillary node involvement, primary tumours > 5 cm, and serum alkaline phosphatase > 60 IU/L, or those with internal mammary node involvement, no skin changes, and serum alkaline phosphatase > 60 IU/L, define a group with a poor prognosis. Patients with estrogen receptor positive tumours, no axillary node involvements, and primary tumours > 5 cm, or estrogen receptor positive tumours, axillary node involvement, primary tumours > 5 cm, but serum alkaline phosphatase ≤ 60 U/L, have an intermediate prognosis. The good prognosis group consists of those patients with estrogen receptor positive tumours who have either skin changes or primary tumours ≤ 5 cm. The effect of loco-regional and systemic therapy was assessed and there was no association between treatment assignment and prognostic group. On the basis of this RECPAM analysis, we have defined important prognostic variables to be used in the design of clinical trials, and three major patient subgroups which can be used in routine oncologic practice as a guide to patient management.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regression and recursive partition strategies in the analysis of medical survival dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- Empiric comparison of multivariate analytic techniques: Advantages and disadvantages of recursive partitioning analysisJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1984
- Oestrogen receptors, clinical features and prognosis in stage III breast cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1982
- Stage III Carcinoma of the Breast A Detailed AnalysisAnnals of Surgery, 1980
- Results of treating stage iii carcinoma of the breast by primary radiation therapyCancer, 1979
- Prognosis in inoperable Stage III carcinoma of the breastEuropean Journal of Cancer (1965), 1977
- Natural history and survival of inoperable breast cancer treated with radiotherapy and radiotherapy followed by radical mastectomyCancer, 1976
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958
- Simple Mastectomy and Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Breast CancerThe British Journal of Radiology, 1955