Continuous and robust measures of the overweight epidemic: 1971–2000
Open Access
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Duke University Press in Demography
- Vol. 41 (2) , 303-314
- https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0015
Abstract
This article considers alternate measures of the overweight epidemic that are more robust to measurement error, continuous in the body-mass index (BMI) at the overweight threshold, and sensitive to changes in the BMI distribution. The measures suggest that prevalence rates may understate the severity of the overweight problem. Since 1971, the prevalence of overweight has increased by 37%, while the distribution-sensitive measure has increased by 173%. Furthermore, although Hispanics have the highest prevalence of overweight, the distribution-sensitive measures reveal that overweight Hispanics exceed the overweight threshold by the smallest proportion (21%), whereas overweight non-Hispanic blacks exceed the threshold by 33%, on average.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Body Mass Index and the Risk of Stroke in MenArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2002
- Obesity and the Risk of Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Public Opinion and the Politics of America's Obesity EpidemicSSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
- Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US populationInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Obesity, disease, and functional limitation in later lifeDemography, 2000
- Guidelines for Healthy WeightNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults--The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health.1998
- How Useful Is Body Mass Index for Comparison of Body Fatness across Age, Sex, and Ethnic Groups?American Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- A Class of Decomposable Poverty MeasuresEconometrica, 1984
- Balanced Repeated Replications for Standard ErrorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1970