Work-Nonwork Conflict and the Phenomenology of Time
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Work and Occupations
- Vol. 28 (1) , 17-39
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888401028001003
Abstract
Most research on work-nonwork conflict emphasizes time allocation, evoking the metaphor of “balancing” time. Balance imagery is restrictive because it neglects the perceptual experience of time and the subjective meanings people assign to it. We propose an alternative metaphor of time as a “container of meaning.” Drawing upon role-identity and self-discrepancy theories, we develop a model and propositions relating meanings derived from work and nonwork time to the experience of work-nonwork conflict. We argue that work-nonwork conflict is shaped not only by time's quantitative aspect but also by the extent to which work and nonwork time is identity affirming versus identity discrepant.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Time BindWorkingUSA, 1997
- THE TIME FAMINE: TOWARDS A SOCIOLOGY OF WORK TIME.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1996
- Dynamic and Static Work-Family RelationshipsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995
- Positive-Spillover Effects from Job to Home: A Closer LookWomen & Health, 1992
- Promoting work/family balance: An organization-change approachOrganizational Dynamics, 1991
- Why executives lose their balanceOrganizational Dynamics, 1990
- Role Burdens and Physical Health of Women and MenWomen & Health, 1986
- Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family RolesAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- The changing pictures of the relationship between career and familyJournal of Organizational Behavior, 1984
- Type A behavior of administrators and wives' reports of marital satisfaction and well-being.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979