Female genital cutting (mutilation/circumcision): ethical and legal dimensions
- 16 November 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Vol. 79 (3) , 281-287
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00277-1
Abstract
The practice better described as female genital cutting (FGC) is of long standing in some communities, and has spread to non‐traditional countries by immigration. It is of varying degrees of invasiveness, often including clitoridectomy, but all raise health‐related concerns, which can be of considerable physical and/or psychological severity, and compromise gynecological and obstetric care. The practice is not based on a requirement of religious observance, although parents usually seek it for their daughters in good faith. It is directed to the social control of women's sexuality, in association with preservation of virginity and family honor. FGC is becoming increasingly prohibited by law, in countries both of its traditional practice and of immigration. Medical practice prohibits FGC. In compromising women's health and negating their sexuality, FGC is a human rights abuse that physicians have a role in eliminating by education of patients and communities.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- In praise of legal feminismLegal Studies, 2002
- Decrease in female genital mutilation among Nigerian Ibo girlsInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2001
- Female genital mutilation in developed countriesThe Lancet, 2001
- Female genital mutilation (FGM) management during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum periodPublished by Wiley ,2000
- The girl childInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2000
- Female Circumcision as a Public Health IssueNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Female genital mutilation and the responsibility of reproductive health professionalsInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1994
- Female CircumcisionInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1992