Self-Enforcing Contracts, Shirking, and Life Cycle Incentives
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 3 (4) , 65-83
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.4.65
Abstract
The labor market is a rich and complicated place. When a worker takes a job he expects to earn a wage, but will also care about rates of wage growth, fringe benefits, levels of risk, retirement practices, pensions, promotion and layoff rules, seniority rights, and grievance procedures. In return, the worker must give up some time, but he is also asked to upgrade his skills, train other workers, provide effort and ideas, and defer to authority in questions of how his time is spent. Great changes are occurring in the way labor market institutions such as these are modeled. Central to the new approach is the concept of a self-enforcing implicit contract. The focus of this essay is on developments in the theory of self-enforcing contracts, and how these can be used to derive predictions about labor market institutions.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Workers' Trust Funds and the Logic of Wage ProfilesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989
- Do Wages Rise with Job Seniority?The Review of Economic Studies, 1987
- Firm-Specific Human Capital and Promotion LaddersThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1983
- Wage-Employment ContractsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983
- The Agent-Agents Problem: Payment by Relative OutputJournal of Labor Economics, 1983
- Why Is There Mandatory Retirement?Journal of Political Economy, 1979
- Implicit Contracts and Underemployment EquilibriaJournal of Political Economy, 1975
- A NEO-CLASSICAL THEORY OF KEYNESIAN UNEMPLOYMENT*Economic Inquiry, 1974
- Wages and Employment under Uncertain DemandThe Review of Economic Studies, 1974
- Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of EnforcersThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1974