Deregulation, Mergers, and Cost Savingsin Class I U.S. Railroads, 1974‐1986
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
- Vol. 1 (2) , 339-369
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1992.00339.x
Abstract
In this paper we attempt to disentangle the effects of deregulation on rail costs from those directly attributable to mergers. We estimate that cost reductions obtained from mergers ranged from a high of 33% for the Burlington Northern to a low of a 3% cost increase for the CSX. However, firms not engaged in significant merger activities experienced similar cost differentials indicating that consolidation was not a prerequisite for cost savings. We conclude that although mergers did confer some benefits on the participating firms, they were not a prerequisite for railroads being able to achieve substantial cost savings.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coal Rates and Revenue Adequacy in a Quasi-Regulated Rail IndustryThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1992
- Rail Costs and Capital Adjustments in a Quasi-Regulated EnvironmentPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1991
- Effects of Community and Family Background on AchievementThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1982
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Productivity in U.S. Railroads, 1951-1974The Bell Journal of Economics, 1980
- ALTERNATIVES FOR RESTRUCTURING THE RAILROADS: END-TO-END OR PARALLEL MERGERS?Economic Inquiry, 1979
- On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section DataEconometrica, 1978
- Economies of Traffic Density in the Rail Freight IndustryThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1977
- Railroad Costs, Returns to Scale, and Excess CapacityThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1974