Iron efficient and inefficient oats. I. Differences in phytosiderophore release
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Plant Nutrition
- Vol. 12 (4) , 423-435
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01904168909363963
Abstract
It has been known for some time that graminaceous species do not respond to Fe stress in the same way as dicots. Until the recent discovery of phytosiderophores in grass species, it has not been possible to characterize known differences in the ability of various cultivars of grasses to obtain Fe. The object of this study was to determine if differences in Fe‐inefficient TAM 0–312 and Fe‐efficient Coker 227 oats are due to their abilities to release a phytosiderophore when under Fe‐deficiency stress. The two cultivars were grown in modified Hoagland solution at several levels of Fe and the release of Fe3+ solubilizing compounds (phytosiderophore), chlorosis development, and the concentration of Fe were routinely assessed as indicators of Fe stress. There was a marked difference between TAM 0–312 and Coker 227 oats in the release of phytosiderophore from their roots. The amount of phytosiderophore released from Coker 227 roots increased as the nutrient Fe concentration increased from 0 to 1.2 mg/L, but declined to near zero with 4.8 mg/L Fe. Practically no phytosiderophore was produced by TAM 0–312 oats at any level of Fe. There were also more severe chlorosis and lower leaf Fe contents with TAM 0–312 than with Coker 227 oats. Although it appears that Coker 227 may be Fe‐efficient because of its ability to respond to Fe‐deficiency stress by producing phytosiderophores, there is a question as to why relatively high concentrations of Fe in nutrient solutions were required to maintain green Coker 227 plants. Also, why was the phytosiderophore not more efficient in solubilizing Fe3+ and making it available to the plant for absorption?This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- An iron chelating compound released by barley roots in response to Fe‐deficiency stressJournal of Plant Nutrition, 1988
- Comparative evaluation of factors involved in Fe stress response in tomato and soybeanJournal of Plant Nutrition, 1987
- Different strategies in higher plants in mobilization and uptake of ironJournal of Plant Nutrition, 1986
- Mugineic acid-iron(III) complex and its structurally analogous cobalt(III) complex: characterization and implication for absorption and transport of iron in gramineous plantsJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1983
- Mechanism of iron uptake by plantsPlant, Cell & Environment, 1978
- Factors Associated with Differential Response of Oat Cultivars to Iron Stress1Crop Science, 1978
- Differential Iron Chlorosis of Oat Cultivars 1Crop Science, 1978
- Iron Requirement and Iron Uptake from Various Iron Compounds by Different Plant SpeciesPlant Physiology, 1974
- Iron Uptake Dependent upon Genotype of CornSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1969
- Response of the Yellow-Stripe Maize Mutant (ys1) to Ferrous and Ferric IronBotanical Gazette, 1958