Are Some Mutual Fund Managers Better Than Others? Cross‐Sectional Patterns in Behavior and Performance
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 54 (3) , 875-899
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00130
Abstract
We examine whether mutual fund performance is related to characteristics of fund managers that may indicate ability, knowledge, or effort. In particular, we study the relationship between performance and the manager's age, the average composite SAT score at the manager's undergraduate institution, and whether the manager has an MBA. Although the raw data suggest striking return differences between managers with different characteristics, most of these can be explained by behavioral differences between managers and by selection biases. After adjusting for these, some performance differences remain. In particular, managers who attended higher‐SAT undergraduate institutions have systematically higher risk‐adjusted excess returns.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Career Concerns of Mutual Fund ManagersThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- On Persistence in Mutual Fund PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- The Effects of Mutual Fund Managers’ Characteristics on Their Portfolio Performance, Risk and FeesFinancial Services Review, 1996
- Performance PersistenceThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Do Winners Repeat?The Journal of Portfolio Management, 1994
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed PortfoliosThe Review of Financial Studies, 1993
- Survivorship Bias in Performance StudiesThe Review of Financial Studies, 1992
- The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1992