Paired comparison of platelet concentrates prepared from platelet‐rich plasma and buffy coats using a new technique with111In and51Cr
- 28 February 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 32 (2) , 113-120
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.1992.32292180138.x
Abstract
Two techniques for the preparation of platelet concentrate (PC), the standard platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) and buffy coat (BC) methods, were compared in nine paired studies with regard to platelet harvest, white cell (WBC) contamination, and PC quality after 5 days of 22°C storage. Platelet harvest using the BC method averaged approximately 56 percent of the whole blood level (6.2 × 1010/concentrate), which was less than the 76 percent achieved with the PRP‐PC method (8.7 × 1010/concentrate). An additional 5 units collected into an experimental siphon bag for BC‐PC processing showed improved platelet harvest (6.7 × 1010/concentrate, or approx. 70% of whole blood). WBCs remaining in the BC‐PC averaged 0.19 × 108 per unit compared to 3.6 × 108 per unit for PRP‐PC. Buffy coat processing produced red cell (RBC) units with 50 percent of the WBC contamination of conventionally prepared units (9.8 ± 6.2 × 108/unit vs. 18.9 ± 7.1 × 108/unit). The siphon bag further reduced WBC levels in the AS‐3 RBC units (6.4 ± 3.7 × 108/unit). In vitro studies performed on Days 1 and 5 after collection showed no significant differences in platelet metabolic and biologic function or cell integrity. β‐thromboglobulin and surface glycoprotein levels, indicators of platelet activation and membrane alteration, respectively, did not differ significantly in the PRP‐PC and BC‐PC; nor was lactate production higher in PRP‐PC, despite the substantially higher WBC counts. Autologous in vivo platelet viability determinations were performed by using concurrent transfusion of 111In‐labeled freshly drawn platelets and 51Cr‐labeled stored platelets. Paired f test analysis of BC‐PC versus PRP‐PC indicated no significant differences in platelet recovery and survival after 5 days of 22°C storage in polyolefin containers. Therefore, these studies confirm the equivalence of PC quality, comparable platelet harvest with the siphon bag, and decreased WBC contamination with the BC method.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preparation of leukocyte-poor platelet concentrates from buffy coats by a new type of quadruple bagAnnals of Hematology, 1990
- A new approach to neocyte transfusion: Preliminary reportJournal of Clinical Apheresis, 1988
- Preparation of Leukocyte‐Poor Platelet Concentrates from Buffy CoatsVox Sanguinis, 1987
- Use of leucocyte‐poor blood components and HLA‐matched‐platelet donors to prevent HLA alloimmunizationBritish Journal of Haematology, 1986
- The Nature of the Leucocyte ‘Contamination’ in Platelet ConcentratesVox Sanguinis, 1985
- Importance of White Blood Cells in Platelet Storage1Vox Sanguinis, 1984
- Buffy Coat or Platelet‐Rich Plasma?Vox Sanguinis, 1984
- Comparative Studies of the in Vivo Kinetics of Simultaneously Injected 111In‐ and 51Cr‐Labelled Human PlateletsScandinavian Journal of Haematology, 1983
- Factors Influencing Changes in pH during Storage of Platelet Concentrates at 20–24°C1,2Vox Sanguinis, 1982
- Indium‐III: a New Radionuclide Label for Studying Human Platelet KineticsBritish Journal of Haematology, 1979