On the Persistence of the ‘Problem of Other Minds’ in Psychology
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theory & Psychology
- Vol. 14 (5) , 601-621
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304046175
Abstract
In this paper we discuss the historical origins and conceptual debts of the Theory of Mind framework (ToM). We investigate its affinities to Chomsky’s psychology, and Paul Grice’s work on meaning. We find that the ToM framework is resourced by the ideas found in Chomsky and Grice, adding very little new to them, and suffering from the same problems of dualism. ToM inherits the traditional dualistic problem of other minds, tries to solve it, and ends up profoundly intellectualizing social interactions.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Where is the ‘Theory’ in Theory of Mind?Theory & Psychology, 2004
- Discourse Participation, Reported Speech and Research Practices in Social PsychologyTheory & Psychology, 1996
- Referring to Internal Occurrences: A Reply to CoulterJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1992
- Bilmes on ‘Internal States’: A Critical CommentaryJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1992
- Mental concepts in the analysis of social actionResearch on Language and Social Interaction, 1990
- Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?Cognition, 1985
- What every speaker cognizesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980
- Empirical evidence in support of non-empiricist theories of mindBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980
- Rules and causationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980
- Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1978