Comparison of Coronary Stenting Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty on Five-Year Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:

• Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction at Hospitals With No Surgery On-Site (the PAMI-No SOS study) versus transfer to surgical centers for primary angioplasty
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004
• A Primer and Comparative Review of Major U.S. Mortality Databases
  Annals of Epidemiology, 2002
• A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: The air primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction study
  Published by Elsevier ,2002
• Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
• Primary stent implantation is superior to balloon angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: Final results of the primary angioplasty versus stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction (PASTA) trial
  Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 1999
• Safety and Cost-Effectiveness of Early Discharge After Primary Angioplasty in Low Risk Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
  Published by Elsevier ,1998
• Randomized Comparison of Coronary Stenting With Balloon Angioplasty in Selected Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
  Circulation, 1998
• In-Hospital and Late Results of Coronary Stents Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction (GRAMI trial)
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1998
• A Clinical Trial Comparing Primary Stenting of the Infarct-Related Artery With Optimal Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
• A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Prophylactic Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation in High Risk Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Angioplasty fn1fn1Funding for this study was provided in part by unrestricted grants from Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Santa Clara, California; Mallinkrodt Medical, Inc., Saint Louis, Missouri; Datascope Corporation, Montvale, New Jersey; St. Jude Medical, Chelmsford, Massachusetts; and Siemens Corporation, Iselin, New Jersey.
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997