Birds of a Feather
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 35 (2) , 285-306
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002791035002007
Abstract
An examination of the alliance choices of democratic states between 1920 and 1939 and between 1946 and 1965 is undertaken to answer the question, do democracies have a tendency to ally with each other more than they ought to according to probability? The analysis of the data indicates that during the first period there was an initial tendency for democratic states to ally with each other at a higher rate than probability indicates should have been the case, but that the overall level of democratic alliances decreased as the rate of their existing alliances dissolved and democracies sought other types of partners. During the period from 1946 to 1965 alliances between democracies were formed and maintained at much higher rates than probability indicates should have been the case. Further analysis demonstrates that this effect is probably not significantly affected by either the effects of previous wartime alliances or geography.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold WarInternational Security, 1990
- Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816-1976Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1989
- The abolition of slavery and the end of international warInternational Organization, 1989
- The Decision to Ally: A Theory and TestThe Western Political Quarterly, 1984
- Mirror, Mirror on the Wall...Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- Flexibility of Alliance Partner Choice in a Multipolar System: Models and TestsInternational Studies Quarterly, 1982
- Issues in the Comparative Measurement of Political DemocracyAmerican Sociological Review, 1980
- Persistence and Change in Political Systems, 1800–1971American Political Science Review, 1974
- Societal Approaches To the Study of WarJournal of Peace Research, 1965
- The Transformation of Alliance SystemsAmerican Political Science Review, 1965