Crossing Vessels at the Ureteropelvic Junction: Do They Influence Endopyelotomy Outcome?
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 10 (2) , 183-187
- https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1996.10.183
Abstract
The majority of crossing vessels probably are inconsequential. Bleeding should not be a concern if the incision is made laterally. The optimal way to improve endopyelotomy results is to determine which crossing vessels truly are significant, and the authors describe the clinical trial that might be carried out to answer the question.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endopyelotomy: Importance of Crossing Vessels Demonstrated by Endoluminal UltrasonographyJournal of Endourology, 1995
- Endoluminal Sonography in Evaluation of the Obstructed Ureteropelvic Junction*Journal of Endourology, 1994
- Effects of Intra-Abdominal Pressure on Renal Tissue Perfusion During Laparoscopy*Journal of Endourology, 1994
- Endopyelotomy and Endoureterotomy with the Acucise Ureteral Cutting Balloon Device: Preliminary ExperienceJournal of Endourology, 1993
- Endoureteropyelotomy in adults Review of procedure and resultsUrology, 1992
- Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adultsUrology, 1984
- THE ROLE OF MANOMETRY IN THE INVESTIGATION OF PELVI-URETERAL FUNCTION: British Association of Urological Surgeons Prize EssayBritish Journal of Urology, 1969
- THE ROLE OF THE LOWER SEGMENTAL VESSEL IN THE AETIOLOGY OF HYDRONEPHROSISAnz Journal of Surgery, 1962
- The anatomy of the intrarenal arteries and its application to segmental resection of the kidneyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1954
- Hydronephrosis in children a clinical study of seventy-eight cases with special reference to the role of aberrant renal vessels and the results of conservative operationsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1953