Is Information Always a Good Thing?
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 40 (Supplement)
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200209001-00006
Abstract
In most cases, patient preferences are crucial in making good health care decisions. For example, choices between chemotherapy and radiation treatment usually hinge on trade-offs that only patients can decide about. In recognition of the importance of patient preferences in clinical decisions, health services researchers have begun developing decision aids to help patients understand complex medical information. But these decision aids might lead to “bad choices”—choices that are inconsistent with people’s stated preferences. In this paper, the author provides examples of how people make inconsistent medical decisions, and briefly discusses future directions for exploring ways of structuring information so that patients are less likely to make inconsistent choices.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Inclusion of Patient Testimonials in Decision AidsMedical Decision Making, 2001
- The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening MammographyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- The role of decision analysis in informed consent: Choosing between intuition and systematicitySocial Science & Medicine, 1997
- Patient Satisfaction with Health Care DecisionsMedical Decision Making, 1996
- Patient Reactions to a Program Designed to Facilitate Patient Participation in Treatment Decisions for Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaMedical Care, 1995
- Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternativesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- A Bedside Decision Instrument To Elicit a Patient's Preference Concerning Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect.Psychological Review, 1982
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974