The Correction for Attenuation
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 56 (1) , 63-75
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056001004
Abstract
This article examines the statistical correction for attenuation and the controversies surrounding the procedure. Although originally developed for test construction purposes, the correction for attenuation is also used in meta-analysis and assessments of validity generalization. Since Spearman's classic article in 1904, correct use and interpretation of the correction for attenuation has been debated. The logic of the double and single correction formulae is discussed as well as the correction producing validity coefficients greater than 1.00. Three types of misapplications and misinterpretations of the correction in published literature are presented. The article concludes with arguments pertaining to the use of the correction formula, and it attempts to sharpen the focus of issues that have led to differences of opinion about its meaning and purpose.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inferential Procedures for Correlation Coefficients Corrected for AttenuationPsychometrika, 1988
- THE VALIDITY OF THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL: A REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 1987
- Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1985
- A Longitudinal Analysis of the Antecedents of Organizational Commitment.The Academy of Management Journal, 1984
- An analysis of correlations corrected for attenuation and range restriction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983
- Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- The Definition and Estimation of Test ReliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1958
- The Measurement of Function FluctuationPsychometrika, 1958
- Test “Reliability”: Its Meaning and DeterminationPsychometrika, 1947
- An Empirical Study of the Influence of Errors of Measurement upon CorrelationThe American Journal of Psychology, 1944