Tests for Trend in Developmental Toxicity Experiments with Correlated Binary Data
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 14 (4) , 639-648
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00277.x
Abstract
In this article, the operating characteristics of recently proposed tests for trend in correlated binary data arising in laboratory studies of developmental toxicity are examined using both computer-generated and experimental data. Specifically, we consider adjusted Cochran-Armitgc tests based on the Rao-Scott transformation which are of the same general form as that for uncorrelated data. In addition, generalized score tests based on generalized estimating equations allowing for extra-binomial variation in the data are discussed. Specific forms of these statistics demonstrating favorable type I and type II error rates are identified and recommended for use in practice. The application of these tests is illustrated using data from studies of developmental toxicity that have been reported in the literature.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Applications of Multinomial Dose‐Response Models in Developmental Toxicity Risk AssessmentRisk Analysis, 1994
- Developmental toxicity of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) I. Multireplicated dose-response studies in four inbred strains and one outbred stock of miceFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1992
- Conditional and unconditional tests with historical controlsThe Canadian Journal of Statistics / La Revue Canadienne de Statistique, 1991
- Hypothesis Testing of Regression Parameters in Semiparametric Generalized Linear Models for Cluster Correlated DataBiometrika, 1990
- The Analysis of Multiple Correlated Binary Outcomes: Application to Rodent Teratology ExperimentsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1989
- On the Asymptotic Distribution of Ratio and Regression EstimatorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1981
- On the Robustness of Combined Tests for Trends in ProportionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1980