A 3-year evaluation of the TCu380Ag and the Cu-7
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Vol. 28 (3) , 269-273
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(89)90729-7
Abstract
The TCu380Ag and the Cu-7 intrauterine devices (IUDs) were evaluated in a randomized comparative clinical trial. A total of 198 women who had not recently been pregnant entered the trial in Manila, Philippines and were followed-up through 3 years postinsertion. The 36-month follow-up rates were impressively high at 80.3 for TCu 380A users and 76.7 for users of the Cu-7. Although the two IUDs demonstrated statistically similar termination rates, the findings suggest a higher efficacy for the TCu380Ag. Gross cumulative life-table pregnancy rates were 0.0 and 4.5 for the TCu380Ag and Cu-7, respectively, at 3 years. Overall 3-year continuation rates were 74.3 and 64.9 for users of the respective devices.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of IUDs: A reviewContraception, 1987
- Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: A randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day deviceContraception, 1987
- Comparative clinical experience with 3 IUDs, TCu 380 Ag, TCu 220C and mahua ring, in Tianjin, People's Republic of ChinaContraception, 1984
- A Prospective Study of NORPLANT Implants and the TCu 380Ag IUD in Assiut, EgyptStudies in Family Planning, 1983
- Long-term clinical experience with the Cu-7-IUD. Evaluation of a prospective studyContraception, 1981
- A new procedure for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraceptionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1977
- Long-term Use Effectiveness of the CU-7-200 IUDInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1976
- Appendix X-2: Use-Effectiveness of Intrauterine Contraception As a Problem in Competing RisksPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1969
- Metallic copper as an intrauterine contraceptive adjunct to the “T” deviceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1969