Science and Sovietology: Bridging the Methods Gap in Soviet Foreign Policy Studies
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 40 (2) , 169-193
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010361
Abstract
Specialists in the study of Soviet foreign policy increasingly feel torn between the positivist culture of political science departments and the holistic traditions of the Soviet area-studies programs. In fact, these approaches are largely complementary. Examples taken from literature on Soviet security policy and on the domestic sources of Soviet expansionism show how positivist theories and methods can be used to clarify holist (or traditionalist) arguments, to sharpen debates, to suggest more telling tests, and to invigorate the field's research agenda.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- International organization: a state of the art on an art of the stateInternational Organization, 1986
- The Offensive/Defensive Balance of Military Technology: A Theoretical and Historical AnalysisInternational Studies Quarterly, 1984
- Richness, Rigor, and Relevance in the Study of Soviet Foreign PolicyInternational Security, 1984
- The “Lessons” of Vietnam and Soviet Foreign PolicyWorld Politics, 1981
- Why Nuclear Superiority Doesn't MatterPolitical Science Quarterly, 1979
- Cooperation under the Security DilemmaWorld Politics, 1978
- The Paradox of Vote TradingAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- The Berlin Crisis of 1961Published by Project MUSE ,1973
- The Berlin Crisis, 1958-1962Published by University of Pennsylvania Press ,1971
- Criticism and the Growth of KnowledgePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970