The innate versus the manifest: How universal does universal have to be?
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 12 (1) , 36-37
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00024249
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 80 references indexed in Scilit:
- The moulding of senescence by natural selectionPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Race differences in sexual behavior: Testing an evolutionary hypothesisJournal of Research in Personality, 1987
- Physical attractiveness and the personality resemblance of identical twinsBehavior Genetics, 1987
- Genetic similarity theory: A reply to Mealey and new evidenceBehavior Genetics, 1985
- Genetic similarity theory: Beyond kin selectionBehavior Genetics, 1984
- Evolutionary causation: how proximate is ultimate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980
- The Utility of Education and Attractiveness for Females' Status Attainment Through MarriageAmerican Sociological Review, 1976
- Assortative mating, or who marries whom?Behavior Genetics, 1972
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964
- Campus Values in Mate Selection: A Repeat StudySocial Forces, 1958