Nadir CA-125 concentration in the normal range as an independent prognostic factor for optimally treated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Open Access
- 6 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 19 (2) , 327-331
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm495
Abstract
Background: The amount of residual disease after surgery is considered the most important factor influencing the survival of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (adEOC). In optimally treated patients with adEOC, there are no well-established prognostic factors [excluding International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage]. The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the prognostic value of the CA-125 nadir after the completion of an optimal primary treatment. Patients and methods: Patients treated for adEOC were identified from January 1998 to December 2006. Inclusion criteria: elevated CA-125 at time of diagnosis (>35 kU/l); FIGO stage III–IV treated with optimal primary treatment (residual tumor Results: Patients, n = 96: 44 group A (≤10 kU/l); 52 group B (11–35 kU/l). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 42 and 20 months for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.0087). Median overall survival (OS) was 84 and 43 months for groups A and B, respectively (P < 0.0001). The Cox model showed a highly significant impact on PFS and OS in relation to CA-125 nadir levels. Conclusions: The CA-125 nadir value is a strong independent prognostic factor for optimally treated adEOC after achieving a complete response.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pretreatment CA-125 and Risk of Relapse in Advanced Ovarian CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Intraperitoneal Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Does the nadir CA125 concentration predict a long-term outcome after chemotherapy for carcinoma of the ovary?Annals of Oncology, 2005
- Phase III Trial of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Compared With Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Optimally Resected Stage III Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer: the ICON3 randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Phase III Trial of Standard-Dose Intravenous Cisplatin Plus Paclitaxel Versus Moderately High-Dose Carboplatin Followed by Intravenous Paclitaxel and Intraperitoneal Cisplatin in Small-Volume Stage III Ovarian Carcinoma: An Intergroup Study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Long-Term Results and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian CancerGynecologic Oncology, 2000
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Long-Term SurvivalGynecologic Oncology, 1999
- Intraperitoneal Cisplatin plus Intravenous Cyclophosphamide versus Intravenous Cisplatin plus Intravenous Cyclophosphamide for Stage III Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996